Case 2407911/2023 · Employment Tribunal
G Walter B Walter v Scan House Solutions Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2407911/2023
- Decision date
- 3 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Walter B Walter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe joined claims in 2407911/2023 and 2407912/2023 were heard on 22 December 2023 before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone by video. After hearing from the claimants, the tribunal established that they had already been paid their statutory entitlements by the Redundancy Payments Office.
On that basis, the tribunal recorded that no further award would be made. The short written record does not break the result down by individual head of claim or set out further reasoning, so the judgment is recorded as a global no-further-award disposal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment does not separate out this head of claim. After hearing from the claimants and confirming that their statutory entitlements had already been paid by the Redundancy Payments Office, the tribunal stated that no further award would be made. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment does not separate out this head of claim. After hearing from the claimants and confirming that their statutory entitlements had already been paid by the Redundancy Payments Office, the tribunal stated that no further award would be made. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment does not separate out this head of claim. After hearing from the claimants and confirming that their statutory entitlements had already been paid by the Redundancy Payments Office, the tribunal stated that no further award would be made. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.