Case 2407913/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Wegrzynowski Mr F Wegrzynowski v Solomon Commercials Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2407913/2023
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Wegrzynowski Mr F Wegrzynowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims brought by Mr K Wegrzynowski and Mr F Wegrzynowski against Solomon Commercials Ltd at Manchester on 1 April 2025. The written judgment records two complaints: unfair dismissal and failure to pay a redundancy payment.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also found that the complaint that the respondent had failed to pay a redundancy payment was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the published judgment. No monetary award is recorded, and the decision is limited to dismissal of both complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.