Case 2407932/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Chomova v Red Dot Commercial Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407932/2022
- Decision date
- 5 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Chomova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The employment judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a hearing on the merits. The listed hearing for 6 February 2023 was cancelled.
On the substantive claim, the tribunal found that Miss M Chomova was dismissed in breach of contract of employment in respect of notice. The respondent was ordered to pay damages in the gross sum of £576.92. The written judgment also included a standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest would only arise if the award were not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract of employment in respect of notice and ordered damages in the gross sum of £576.92. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £577
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.