Case 2407961/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ellidge v Make Jesus Known and Mr T Cooke — 2022
- Case reference
- 2407961/2021
- Decision date
- 14 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on whether Mrs Ellidge was a disabled person within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of mobile caecum syndrome and prolapsed caecum. It was common ground that she had those physical impairments. The relevant period was 10 to 13 March 2021, and the tribunal asked whether the impairments had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on her ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities during that period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within s.6 EqA 2010 during 10-13 March 2021. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.6 EqA 2010
- s.212(1) EqA 2010
- Schedule 1 para 2(1)(b) EqA 2010
- Schedule 1 para 2(2) EqA 2010
- Schedule 1 para 5 EqA 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- Paterson v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Elliott v Dorset County Council
- SCA Packaging v Boyle
- All Answers Ltd v W
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.