Case 2407965/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Stockton v Little Frogs Day Nursery and Pre School Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407965/2021
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Stockton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes entered judgment for the claimant on the paper record and did not record any contested liability findings beyond the claims set out in the judgment.
The tribunal held that Little Frogs Day Nursery and Pre School Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £534.60 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,069.20 gross in damages. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £801.90.
The tribunal further held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,315.11 gross. The judgment directed that the gross sums under the wages, notice pay, and holiday pay awards were subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance, which the respondent was to account for to HMRC. A separate interest notice accompanied the judgment, stating that statutory interest may apply if sums remain unpaid after 14 days, but no quantified interest figure was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered as a gross sum; the judgment states that tax and national insurance deductions, if any, are to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £535 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £802 |
| Holiday pay | Ordered as a gross sum; the judgment states that tax and national insurance deductions, if any, are to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £1,315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,721
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.