Case 2407968/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Glasgow v Little Frogs Day Nursery and Pre School Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407968/2021
- Decision date
- 6 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Glasgow
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response within the prescribed time limit. Employment Judge Holmes awarded three sums in favour of Miss A Glasgow: £1,389.96 gross for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, £8,339.76 as a redundancy payment, and £4,564.10 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The judgment directed that the gross sums in paragraphs 1 and 3 were subject to the appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance, if any, due under those paragraphs, with the respondent required to account to HMRC. A separate notice explained the tribunal interest regime and stated the relevant decision day and calculation day for this case, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,390 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £8,340 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement; award expressed as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £4,564 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,294
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.