Case 2407969/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Whitney v Little Frogs Day Nursery and Pre School Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407969/2021
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Whitney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented by the respondent. It therefore determined the claim on the papers without a contested hearing.
Miss R Whitney succeeded on four heads of claim. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £342.00. It also found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,368.00.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £342.00. It also held that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,427.88.
The judgment stated that the sums at paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 were gross sums subject to any appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance, which the respondent was required to account for to HMRC. A separate notice explained the tribunal interest regime, recording the relevant judgment day as 5 November 2021, the calculation day as 6 November 2021, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% if the award remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £342 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,368 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £342 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,428 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,480
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.