Case 2407970/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Stockton v Little Frogs Day Nursery and Pre School Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2407970/2021
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Stockton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented by the respondent. On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant, Miss E Stockton, against Little Frogs Day Nursery and Pre School Limited on four monetary claims.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £540 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,080 gross in damages. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,240.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,598.40 gross. The judgment states that the respondent must account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance deductions due under paragraphs 1, 2 and 4. The attached interest notice stated that unpaid sums would carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 after 14 days, at the stipulated rate of 8%, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £540 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,240 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,598 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,458
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.