Case 2408023/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Simon McEwen v Owen’s Express Recruitment Liverpool (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408023/2021
- Decision date
- 9 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Cline
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Simon McEwen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 29 April 2022 before Employment Judge Robert Cline. The claimant, Mr Simon McEwen, appeared in person. The respondent, Owen’s Express Recruitment Liverpool (In Voluntary Liquidation), did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s holiday pay claim. It found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £1,687.50 within 14 days.
The written record also included the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that unpaid sums may carry interest if not paid within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties. No separate interest figure was calculated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,687.50 within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £1,688 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,688
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.