Case 2408035/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Louise Price of Counsel For the v Mr Darren Comerford – solicitor — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408035/2021
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Louise Price of Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the public preliminary hearing on 18 February 2022, Employment Judge A M Buchanan recorded by consent that Ms C Wood-Hope was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at all material times by reason of stress reaction, depression and anxiety. The respondents were Salford City Council and The Governors of the Friars Primary School, and the claimant was represented by Ms Louise Price of Counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment states that all other complaints advanced by the claimant would proceed to full hearing. The tribunal also directed that arguments on time limits would be dealt with at the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the complaint of direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.