Case 2408064/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Breczku v GWA Law Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408064/2021
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Breczku
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Ms F Breczku against GWA Law Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £899.39.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,190.84. The hearing listed for 26 October 2021 was cancelled.
A separate notice attached to the judgment explained that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, with the stipulated rate identified as 8%, but no interest figure was calculated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal ordered payment of the net sum of £899.39 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £899 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,190.84. | Upheld | — | £1,191 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,090
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.