Case 2408068/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jones v IMT Transport Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408068/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Ms A Ramsden, Mr A Wells
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool, Employment Judge Benson with Ms A Ramsden and Mr A Wells sitting on 28 February and 1-3 March 2023, the tribunal found that Mr S Jones was unfairly dismissed by IMT Transport Limited. The award was £4,357.90 in total, consisting of a compensatory award of £3,857.90 for three weeks' pay and benefits covering 2 to 21 March 2021, plus £500 for loss of statutory rights. The schedule recorded a nil basic award.
The claimant's discrimination arising from disability claim failed and was dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay. The holiday pay claim was recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal further recorded that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply. No named legal test or authority is set out in the short extracted judgment reasons.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered compensation of £4,357.90, made up of a compensatory award of £3,857.90 and £500 for loss of statutory rights; the basic award was nil. | Upheld | — | £4,358 |
| Disability discrimination | The claim was for discrimination arising from disability and failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice-period breach of contract claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records the holiday pay claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,358
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,858
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.