Case 2408072/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Goodwin v 6C2M Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408072/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Goodwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 April 2021, the tribunal gave Ms K Goodwin an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out. The reasons given were that the claims had not been actively pursued and that it was no longer possible to have a hearing because the respondent was no longer in existence as a legal entity.
Ms Goodwin did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Holmes Date therefore ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out after the tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; no substantive merits finding was made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Struck out after the tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; no substantive merits finding was made. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Struck out after the tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; no substantive merits finding was made. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; no substantive merits finding was made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Struck out after the tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; no substantive merits finding was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.