Case 2408072/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Finn v Mr J Brierton t/a Andrew’s Dry Cleaners — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408072/2021
- Decision date
- 7 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dennehy Case
- Venue
- Manchester via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Finn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal refused the Claimant's application to strike out the Respondent's defence, which had been based on alleged failure to comply with case management orders. It then held that the Claimant's claim for unfair constructive dismissal succeeded. The judgment does not record the remedy, because that was left to a later hearing listed for 1 July 2022 at 10:00am by remote cloud video platform.
The Claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages, described as covering arrears of pay and holiday pay, was not determined on its merits. The Tribunal recorded that those claims were dismissed having been withdrawn, because the parties had settled them before the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The Tribunal described this as the Claimant's claim for unfair constructive dismissal and said it succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for arrears of pay and holiday pay was said to be dismissed having been withdrawn, because the parties had settled it before the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.