Case 2408076/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Beardall v Candy Swirls UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408076/2022
- Decision date
- 5 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Beardall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Phil Allen recorded that a determination could properly be made on the claim without a response from the respondent.
The tribunal found that Mrs B Beardall was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment awarded her £11,041.50. No separate split between basic award, compensatory award, or other heads of loss was set out in the judgment.
The notice attached to the judgment explains the tribunal's interest regime and states that interest would be payable only if the sum remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, which was 5 January 2023. The judgment itself does not quantify any interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Determined on the basis of a rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £11,042 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,042
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.