Case 2408083/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Homecare Northwest Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408083/2022
- Decision date
- 23 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge McDonald determined the claims under rule 21 after considering the information provided by the claimants at the 7 December 2022 hearing and in response to the case management orders made at that hearing. No order was made for unpaid mileage because the claim forms did not include expenses claims, and no award was made for loss of statutory rights because the claimants had not brought unfair dismissal claims.
For Mrs H Van Weerdenburg, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages of £367.31, breach of contract in respect of notice with damages of £420.14 after mitigation against a notice entitlement of £2,320.64, redundancy pay of £2,320.64, and accrued annual leave entitlement of £1,812. The tribunal rejected her claim for loss of statutory maternity pay entitlement, holding that damages were not payable on that basis in the circumstances it identified.
For Ms C Jones, Mrs V Coull-Middling and Mr G Middling, the tribunal upheld claims for unauthorised deduction from wages, notice pay breach of contract, and redundancy payment. Ms C Jones received no notice damages because her earnings in new employment exceeded the £2,863.84 notice entitlement, while Mrs V Coull-Middling and Mr G Middling received notice damages of £175.10 and £957.52 respectively. The redundancy payments were £4,295.76 for Ms C Jones, £730.20 for Mrs V Coull-Middling and £3,514.57 for Mr G Middling, making a total amount ordered of £15,370.45.
Claims and outcomes
13 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs H Van Weerdenburg: unauthorised deduction from wages; gross sum £367.31. | Upheld | — | £367 |
| Breach of contract | Mrs H Van Weerdenburg: dismissed in breach of contract as to notice; statutory notice pay was £2,320.64, reduced by £1,900.50 earnings in new employment. | Upheld | — | £420 |
| Redundancy | Mrs H Van Weerdenburg: redundancy payment of £2,320.64. | Upheld | — | £2,321 |
| Working time regulations | Mrs H Van Weerdenburg: accrued annual leave entitlement; gross sum £1,812 (21.9 days at £82.74 daily rate). | Upheld | — | £1,812 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ms C Jones: unauthorised deduction from wages; gross sum £476.44. | Upheld | — | £476 |
| Breach of contract | Ms C Jones: dismissed in breach of contract as to notice, but no damages were awarded because earnings in new employment (£3,123.05) fully mitigated the £2,863.84 notice entitlement. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Ms C Jones: redundancy payment of £4,295.76. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,370
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 21
- The Wise Group v Mrs L Mitchell 2005 ICR 896
- Statutory Maternity Pay (General) Regulations 1986/1960 regulation 3
- Lavarack v Woods of Colchester Ltd [1967] 1 QB 278
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.