Mr Simon Daly v Sauermann UK Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 2408086/2020
Decision date: 28 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Newstead Taylor

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Simon Daly

Respondent

Sauermann UK Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Newstead Taylor, heard Mr Simon Daly's claims against Sauermann UK Ltd on 18 February, 29 March and 23 April 2021. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and records only the formal outcome of the case.

Mr Daly's unfair dismissal claim, brought under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was found not well founded and was dismissed. His separate breach of contract claim in relation to notice pay was also found not well founded and dismissed.

The decision does not set out a separate monetary award, and no remedy figures are recorded in the written judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Claim brought under s.94 ERA 1996; the tribunal held it was not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The claim concerned notice pay and was held not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.