Case 2408092/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gibson v Inglis Jane Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408092/2020
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Ms H D Price, Mr H Husain
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Gibson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Liverpool on 25-26 October 2023 before Employment Judge Ainscough, Ms H D Price and Mr H Husain. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The written decision therefore states only the outcomes, not the detailed factual or legal reasoning behind them.
The claimant, Mr A Gibson, brought claims against Inglis Jane Limited and Mr C Everett for unfair dismissal because of a protected disclosure, detriments because of a protected disclosure, and wrongful dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim and the detriments claim.
The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded. The judgment states that the first respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £25,000. No separate breakdown of that sum is given in the written record, and no other remedy component is recorded.
Because the written decision is limited to the formal outcome, the extraction is confined to the tribunal's stated results: the protected-disclosure unfair dismissal and detriment claims were unsuccessful, and the wrongful dismissal claim was upheld with a £25,000 award against the first respondent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim pleaded as unfair dismissal because of a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriments because of a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment records 'wrong dismissal' rather than 'wrongful dismissal'; treated here as wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.