Case 2408094/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Dickson v Miguel Doforo/MD Creatives Academy Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408094/2022
- Decision date
- 21 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Dickson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out for not having been actively pursued. By a letter dated 28 February 2024, the tribunal gave Mr A Dickson an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out on that basis.
Mr Dickson did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any determination of the underlying merits of the claim.
The decision was signed by Employment Judge Benson and dated 15 March 2024, with judgment sent to the parties on 21 March 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By a letter dated 28 February 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but he failed to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.