Case 2408128/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Pearson v The Green Piranha Landscaping Limited (Dissolved) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408128/2022
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Pearson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr L Pearson's claim against The Green Piranha Landscaping Limited (Dissolved). The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued. By correspondence dated 18 July 2023 and 14 September 2023, the tribunal gave Mr Pearson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out.
The judgment records that Mr Pearson failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Leach ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.