Case 2408150/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I McMahon v ASE plc UPON APPLICATION made by email dated 10 November 2022 to reconsider the — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408150/2021
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I McMahon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent applied by email on 10 November 2022 for reconsideration of the tribunal's earlier costs decision, which had refused its application for costs after the claimant withdrew an application to amend his claim. The reconsideration was determined on the papers and, on the tribunal's analysis, the original decision was confirmed. The judge noted that the parties had been represented by counsel at the original hearing and that the respondent's solicitor was present.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's application under rule 71 to reconsider the earlier costs judgment was refused. The tribunal confirmed the original decision that the claimant should not be liable for the respondent's costs. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- rule 70
- rule 71
- rule 72(1)
- rule 72(3)
- rules 70-73
- overriding objective
- Outasight VB Ltd v Brown
- Ladd v Marshall
- Williams v Ferrosan Ltd
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne CC v Marsden
- Ministry of Justice v Burton
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.