Case 2408153/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Brennan v St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 18 September 2022 to reconsider the — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408153/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a reconsideration under rules 70 and 73 of a judgment originally given on 13 September 2022. The claimant said her amended schedule of loss had wrongly reduced occupational maternity pay by taking £243 per month of salary sacrifice for childcare vouchers into account, and she asked for the award to be increased from £977.92 plus £93.02 interest to £2,673.63 plus £254.32 interest.
The tribunal accepted that the matter was capable of reconsideration, but refused the application. It held that the NHS Terms and Conditions of Service Handbook required full pay to be calculated using the average weekly earnings rules for statutory maternity pay, and that where part of salary is sacrificed under a salary sacrifice arrangement the sacrificed amount does not count as earnings for SMP, and therefore OMP, purposes. On that basis, the tribunal said the original calculation was correct and the claimant's argument that £243 should be added back was wrong.
The tribunal also said that Williams v Ferrosan Ltd did not assist the claimant because there had been no shared misapprehension by the tribunal and both parties about the figures used at the hearing. It found that the claimant had positively advanced the calculation that was accepted at the original hearing, so the reconsideration application would have failed in any event. The application was refused and the original award of £977.92 plus £93.02 interest, totalling £1,070.94, stood.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim succeeded and ordered payment of £1,070.94 including £93.02 interest; the principal award remained £977.92 after the reconsideration application was refused. | Upheld | — | £978 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,071
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £978
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 70 reconsideration
- interests of justice
- balance of prejudice
- overriding objective
- Williams v Ferrosan Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.