Case 2408155/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M G Tavares Duarte v Four Winds Enterprise Limited t/a Niche Kitchens — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408155/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M G Tavares Duarte
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, with no valid response presented by the respondent within the prescribed time limit. Employment Judge Holmes found that Four Winds Enterprise Limited t/a Niche Kitchens had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss M G Tavares Duarte's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,313.70, subject to the appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance if any, which the respondent must account for to HMRC. The judgment states that the tribunal cannot make any other awards on a deduction of wages claim, and the claimant's general financial compensation claim was therefore not awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,313.70, less any appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance. The judgment also states that no other awards can be made on a deduction of wages claim, so the claimant's general financial compensation claim was not awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,314 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,314
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.