Case 2408157/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ogundu v Stockport NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408157/2022
- Decision date
- 21 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ogundu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis case, heard at Manchester on 7 to 15 October 2024 before Employment Judge Leach sitting alone, concerned claims by Mr M Ogundu against Stockport NHS Foundation Trust. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written judgment records four complaints: constructive unfair dismissal under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, and unauthorised deductions from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal dismissed all four complaints. The written record does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasons because it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records a direct discrimination complaint on the protected characteristic of race under section 13 Equality Act 2010 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records a victimisation complaint under section 27 Equality Act 2010 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.