Case 2408161/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Woods v NHS Property Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408161/2021
- Decision date
- 28 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Woods
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of sex discrimination relating to events between 7 February 2020 and 21 April 2020.
The tribunal found that those complaints were presented outside the primary time period of three months. It also found that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaints.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records the jurisdiction decision only and makes no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination complaints relating to events between 7 February 2020 and 21 April 2020 were presented outside the primary three-month time period, that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- primary time period of 3 months
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.