Case 2408165/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Kozikowski v Bakkavor Foods Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408165/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Kozikowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Manchester by CVP on 13 June 2022, Employment Judge Feeney determined preliminary disability-status issues under the Equality Act 2010 for Mr M Kozikowski. The tribunal held that he was disabled by reason of his heart condition, and that he was not disabled by reason of plantar fasciitis.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No monetary remedy or further substantive discrimination outcome is recorded in the judgment, so the decision is limited to the disability-status findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue: the tribunal held the claimant was disabled by his heart condition under the Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue: the tribunal held the claimant was not disabled by his plantar fasciitis under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.