Case 2408300/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Westhead v Happy Days Hospitality Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408300/2022
- Decision date
- 24 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Westhead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr W Westhead did not attend the hearing on 2 May 2023 and gave no reason for his absence. When the clerk telephoned him, there was no response on the number provided. The tribunal also noted that, after a case management order sent on 24 January 2023, he had been required to provide the respondent and the tribunal with a summary of the sums said to be owed and copies of supporting documents by 21 February 2023, but he did not do so.
Employment Judge Phil Allen held that rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure allowed strike out where there had been non-compliance with an order of the tribunal or where the claim had not been actively pursued. On that basis, the judge struck out the claim on both grounds.
The reasons also state that, even if the claim had not already been struck out, the unfair dismissal claim would have been struck out because the claimant did not have two years' continuous employment with the respondent, which is required to bring such a claim. The judge further noted that the claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why that claim should not be struck out in the tribunal's letter of 18 October 2022, but had not done so.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with an order and under rule 37(1)(d) because it was not actively pursued. The judge also said the unfair dismissal claim would in any event have been struck out because the claimant did not have two years' continuous employment and had not given reasons why it should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- two years' continuous employment requirement for unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.