Case 2408320/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Adshead v 247 Commercial Vehicles Limited t/a 247 Vans — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408320/2021
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Adshead
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 20 May 2022 before Employment Judge Anderson sitting alone via CVP. The tribunal amended the identity of the respondent to 247 Commercial Vehicles Limited t/a 247 Vans. It also found that Mr Lee Adshead was a worker within the meaning of s.230(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996.
The only substantive complaint recorded in the judgment was unlawful deduction from wages. That complaint was found to be well founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £910.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal amended the respondent name to 247 Commercial Vehicles Limited t/a 247 Vans and found that the claimant was a worker within the meaning of s.230(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £910 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £910
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.230(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.