Case 2408341/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Walayat v Uber Britannia Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408341/2022
- Decision date
- 3 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Walayat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant presented complaints of direct race discrimination and breach of contract on 12 October 2022. A preliminary hearing was held on 23 February 2023, at which the Employment Judge directed the Respondent to set out its position on the Claimant's employment status and directed the Claimant to confirm whether he said he was an employee or a worker, because jurisdiction over breach of contract depended on that issue.
The Respondent maintained that the Claimant was a worker. The Claimant then confirmed that he agreed with that position, while arguing that the Tribunal should still allow the breach of contract claim to proceed because he had entered into a contract and believed the Employment Tribunal was the proper forum.
The Tribunal held that its jurisdiction was set by legislation and that, on the Claimant's own case, he was a worker rather than an employee. It therefore concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract complaint and struck that claim out. The Judge said the Claimant had not given an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out.
The strike out did not affect the race discrimination claim, which the Tribunal recorded would continue. The case management orders made at the preliminary hearing remained in force. No monetary remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out because the Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. The Claimant agreed he was a worker, not an employee, and the Tribunal said its jurisdiction under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 and section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 did not extend to a worker's breach of contract claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.