Case 2408345/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Britannia Hotels Limited (1) Britannia Hotels Number 2 Limited (2) v Environmental Health Officer Richard Parkinson and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408345/2022
- Decision date
- 27 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson MEMBERS
- Panel members
- Ms C Neild, Mr P Dobson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Britannia Hotels Limited (1) Britannia Hotels Number 2 Limited (2)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese proceedings were an appeal under section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 against six prohibition notices issued on 22 September 2022 concerning hotel rooms at the Adelphi Hotel in Liverpool. The appeal was heard on 14 June 2023. After submissions, the parties reached an agreement in principle and the tribunal approved a judgment reflecting that agreed position.
The tribunal recorded that Britannia Hotels Limited did not have control or management of the Adelphi Hotel at the material time. On that basis, Prohibition Notices 830938/RP1, 830938/TG1 and 830938/TG2 were cancelled.
For Notice 830938/TG3, the respondents said they had since become aware of evidence about the subject matter of the notice, namely a wardrobe in room 648, and did not seek to continue with it. Notice 830938/TG4 was also cancelled because the respondents were not aware when it was issued that the slimline wardrobe had already been removed, and the tribunal considered that, taking section 24(2) together with Chevron, it was not appropriate to continue the notice.
Notice 830938/RP2, which related to windows at the Adelphi Hotel, was affirmed without modification because the second claimant no longer wished to continue its appeal. The result was that five notices were cancelled and one was affirmed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Prohibition Notice 830938/RP1 was cancelled on the appeal under section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Prohibition Notice 830938/TG1 was cancelled on the appeal under section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Prohibition Notice 830938/TG2 was cancelled on the appeal under section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Prohibition Notice 830938/RP2 was affirmed without modification after the second claimant said it no longer wished to continue its appeal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Prohibition Notice 830938/TG3 was cancelled after the respondents said they no longer sought to continue with it in light of later evidence about the wardrobe in room 648. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Prohibition Notice 830938/TG4 was cancelled because, applying Chevron, it was not appropriate to continue the notice once it emerged that the slimline wardrobe in question had been removed. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 24(2) Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974
- HM Inspector of Health and Safety v Chevron North Sea Ltd 2018 SC (UKSC) 132
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.