Case 2408356/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Rosario Lino v Euro Group Limited HELD AT: Liverpool — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408356/2021
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Rosario Lino
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 2 January 2024 was conducted remotely by CVP before Employment Judge Shotter sitting alone. No oral evidence was heard and the judgment was concerned with case management and strike out rather than the merits of the substantive claims. The tribunal noted that the claimant had not engaged with her solicitors for a significant period and had failed to comply with earlier orders for disclosure, witness statements and a schedule of loss.
The claimant’s unlawful deduction of wages claim, said to concern unpaid salary between December 2018 and November 2019, was struck out under Rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal accepted the respondent’s position that the claim was problematic, including on time limit grounds, and held that the lack of information and non-compliance meant the respondent was prejudiced and a fair trial on that issue could not take place. The tribunal concluded that the claim was scandalous, vexatious or had no reasonable prospects of success.
The claimant’s claim for accrued holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any compensatory or other monetary award. The tribunal also recorded that the unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination claims remained listed for the final hearing, but the claimant was warned that failure to comply with the disclosure and witness statement orders by the stated dates would result in automatic strike out of those claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim relating to unpaid salary between December 2018 and November 2019; struck out under Rule 37(1) after the tribunal found the claim had no reasonable prospects of success and that a fair trial could not take place because the claimant had not provided sufficient information or complied with case management steps. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37(1) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Mbusia v Cygnet Healthcare Ltd EAT 0119/18
- scandalous, vexatious or no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.