Case 2408373/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L M McKenzie v Ellard Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408373/2021
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L M McKenzie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by Employment Judge Sharkett at Manchester by CVP on 30 May 2022, did not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claim. Instead, it considered whether the claimant had complied with an Unless Order dated 14 March 2022.
It found that the claimant was in material breach of that Unless Order. As a result, the tribunal held that the claim was automatically struck out on 23 April 2022.
The tribunal then reconsidered the strike out, described in the judgment as relief from sanction, and decided that the claimant’s claim remained struck out. No compensatory or other monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not restate the substantive pleaded claim, but the case listing identifies the matter as an unfair dismissal case. The tribunal found the claimant was in material breach of an Unless Order dated 14 March 2022, held that the claim was automatically struck out on 23 April 2022, and on reconsideration of strike out/relief from sanction held that the claim remained struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.