Case 2408406/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Smith v El Uno Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408406/2021
- Decision date
- 7 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester by CVP on 6 December 2021, Employment Judge Ganner, sitting alone, found in the claimant Miss T Smith's favour on two monetary claims against El Uno Limited. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay £729.00 gross.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement for untaken holiday on termination of employment and ordered payment of £549.36 gross. The total sum payable was £1,278.36. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £729.00. | Upheld | — | £729 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement for untaken holiday on termination of employment and ordered payment of the gross sum of £549.36. | Upheld | — | £549 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,278
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.