Case 2408415/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Moors v Testerworld Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408415/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Moors
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response and the administrators consented to the claim continuing. On the available material, it found that as at 9 May 2022 the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Trafford Park depot, and that the claimant was an affected employee who was dismissed as redundant on 29 July 2022.
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to consult appropriate representatives and disclose the statutory information under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found there was no recognised independent trade union for the claimant's description of employee, no existing representatives with authority to be consulted, no representatives elected under section 188A, no invitation to elect such representatives, and no individual consultation with the claimant.
The complaint under section 189 was found well founded. The Tribunal found no special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable and no mitigating circumstances. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and the guidance in GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, it made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 29 July 2022, equivalent to remuneration for that period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for alleged failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of the claimant's redundancy dismissal. The taxonomy has no specific protective award category, so classified as other. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd
- E Green & Son (Castings) Ltd v Association of Scientific, Technical & Managerial Staffs
- TGWU v Ledbury Preserves
- Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Aspinall
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.