Case 2408420/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jackson v Jackson Lees Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408420/2022
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on a preliminary disability issue, heard by Employment Judge Ganner sitting alone at Manchester by CVP on 5 June 2023. By consent, the tribunal determined that Miss R Jackson was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 for the period between September 2020 and October 2022. The impairment identified was anxiety.
The judgment does not set out findings on liability for the substantive discrimination complaints, and it records no remedy or award. It is therefore limited to the tribunal's agreement on disability status for the relevant period, rather than any determination of the merits of the wider case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue determined by consent: the tribunal found that between September 2020 and October 2022 the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of anxiety. No merits decision on the underlying discrimination claims is recorded in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.