Case 2408425/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Young v JSA Property Management Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408425/2022
- Decision date
- 20 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mcdonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge therefore made a Rule 21 determination on the material before the Tribunal. The only substantive claim recorded in the judgment was that JSA Property Management Ltd had failed to pay Miss L Young's holiday entitlement.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,249.91. The calculation recorded in the judgment was based on an annual salary of £30,000, equivalent to £576.92 per week and £115.38 per day, multiplied by 19.5 days of holiday entitlement.
The written record was accompanied by the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, which stated that the relevant decision day was 20 March 2023, the calculation day was 21 March 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if the sum remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,249.91. | Upheld | — | £2,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.