Case 2408428/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408428/2022
- Decision date
- 18 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe appellant appealed against a notice of underpayment issued by HMRC under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The disputed issues concerned whether accommodation-related deductions or payments for three workers fell within Regulation 14 of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015 and therefore had to be treated as reductions, subject to the accommodation offset.
The Tribunal found that deductions made from wages for Mr Gibson, Mr Cartwright and Mr Muller during the periods when the appellant deducted rent from pay were deductions the appellant was entitled to make and were as respects the provision of living accommodation by the employer. The Tribunal found that the accommodation was provided by the appellant for Regulation 14 purposes, applying a purposive approach, despite the properties being owned by Mr Lawton, or by Mr Lawton and another individual.
The Tribunal reached a different conclusion for payments made by Mr Muller directly from November 2018 onwards to a bank account for the benefit of the landlords. Those payments were not deductions the appellant was entitled to make and were not payments the appellant was entitled to receive. The notice of underpayment therefore required rectification for those sums only, with the precise figures to be agreed by the parties or determined at a further hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Appeal against a notice of underpayment under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 was allowed only to the extent that sums paid directly by Mr C Muller for accommodation from November 2018 onwards required rectification; all other grounds did not require rectification. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 19C(8) of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998
- Regulation 14 of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
- Regulation 16 of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Ant Marketing Limited
- HMRC v Leisure Employment Services Limited
- HMRC v Middlesbrough Football and Athletic Co (1986) Ltd
- Mohammed Mohsan Ali v London Borough of Newham
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.