Case 2408447/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Cash v Boe Gin Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408447/2022
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Cash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal listed claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, and unlawful deduction from wages. The claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing on 13 April 2023 and had also failed to attend the earlier preliminary hearing on 23 February 2023. He was not represented and the respondent attended through Mr R Smith.
Employment Judge Martin considered Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, which permits strike-out where a party fails to comply with an order, fails to attend, or is not actively pursuing the case. The judgment records that the claimant had been ordered on 23 February 2023 to provide further and better particulars of his claim by 30 March 2023, but did not do so.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out all of the claimant's claims and the judgment states that they were dismissed. No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed after the tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 because the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and was not actively pursuing the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed after strike-out under Rule 37 for non-attendance, failure to comply with the order for further and better particulars by 30 March 2023, and failure actively to pursue the claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Dismissed after strike-out under Rule 37 for non-attendance, failure to comply with the order for further and better particulars by 30 March 2023, and failure actively to pursue the claim. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed after strike-out under Rule 37 because the claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing and did not actively pursue the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.