Case 2408457/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Bowes v Davy Jones Locker Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408457/2021
- Decision date
- 6 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Bowes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs L Bowes brought a short tribunal claim against Davy Jones Locker Limited, heard at Liverpool on 29 November 2021 before Employment Judge Aspinall. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal made an award in respect of holiday pay only.
The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay £659.79 for holiday pay due to the claimant for an accrued 73.3 hours at a gross hourly rate of £9 per hour. No separate breakdown for other heads of loss was given in the judgment.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The accompanying notice also records the tribunal's interest information, including the relevant judgment day of 6 December 2021, the calculation day of 7 December 2021, and a stipulated interest rate of 8%, but no separate interest sum was awarded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay holiday pay due on an accrued 73.3 hours at a gross hourly rate of £9 per hour. | Upheld | — | £660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £660
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.