Case 2408464/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Carter v Paloma B&K Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408464/2021
- Decision date
- 18 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 18 July 2022 Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out Miss E Carter's claim against Paloma B&K Ltd. The tribunal said that by a letter dated 6 April 2022 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 15, 16 and 17 August 2023 was therefore not to take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the Tribunal's letter dated 6 April 2022 invited representations or a request for a hearing and the claimant made none or no sufficient representations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.