Case 2408475/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs L Furness (2) Miss M Ithnin (3) Mrs K Lonorgan-Smith v Jasmine’s Day Nursery Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2408475/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs L Furness (2) Miss M Ithnin (3) Mrs K Lonorgan-Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe proceedings in cases 2408475/2020, 2408479/2020 and 2408483/2020 were dismissed after the claimants withdrew their claims. The judgment records no findings on liability, no merits determination, and no remedy award.
Employment Judge Phil Allen signed the judgment on 8 September 2020, and it was sent to the parties on 30 September 2020. The text identifies the respondents as Jasmine’s Day Nursery Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Proceedings dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; no merits determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Proceedings dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; no merits determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Proceedings dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; no merits determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Proceedings dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; no merits determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Proceedings dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; no merits determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.