Case 2408493/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Golding v I4 Technology Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408493/2021
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Golding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Holmes Date determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment was sent to the parties on 6 June 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It identified unpaid sums of one month’s pay, £2,500, and one month’s car allowance, £416.66, and ordered payment of £2,916.66 gross. It also found a breach of contract for failing to give one month’s notice of termination and ordered damages of £673.05 gross. In addition, the tribunal found that 2 days of untaken holiday had not been paid and ordered £230.76 gross.
The claim for a redundancy payment was struck out because the claimant lacked the necessary two years’ qualifying service, and the unfair dismissal complaint was also struck out for the same reason. The judgment records that, although stress or interest had been claimed, the tribunal had no power to make any award for stress or interest. The total payable was £3,820.47 gross, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance for which the respondent must account to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages comprising one month’s pay of £2,500 and one month’s car allowance of £416.66. | Upheld | — | £2,917 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failing to give one month’s notice of termination. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay 2 days’ untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Redundancy | Struck out because the claimant lacked the necessary two years’ qualifying service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant lacked the necessary two years’ qualifying service. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,820
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.