Case 2408536/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Devaney v Prime Care (UK) Ltd Trading As Sylvan House — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408536/2021
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Devaney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal ordered Prime Care (UK) Ltd trading as Sylvan House to pay Mrs A Devaney the agreed sum of £95.85 in respect of her Statutory Sick Pay claim. That was the only monetary payment recorded in the judgment.
The claimant's notice pay claim was dismissed following her withdrawal of that claim. The holiday pay claim was dismissed as out of time, and the tribunal recorded no separate award for either claim.
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was found not well founded and dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the agreed sum of £95.85 in respect of the claimant's Statutory Sick Pay claim. | Settled | — | £96 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's notice pay claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £96
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.