Case 2408546/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E Coles v Boujee Restaurant and Bar (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2408546/2022
- Decision date
- 1 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Coles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £869.85, calculated as £1,159.51 less £289.95 already received. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £231.90.
The judgment records that the respondent is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance on the sums awarded. The decision was approved by Employment Judge Shotter on 11 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 1 May 2025. The accompanying notice sets out the statutory interest position under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, identifying 1 May 2025 as the relevant decision day, 2 May 2025 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net sum of £869.85 (£1,159.51 less £289.95 already received). | Upheld | — | £870 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; net award £231.90. | Upheld | — | £232 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,102
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.