Case 2408547/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Deri v Strathmore Hotels Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408547/2021
- Decision date
- 6 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Deri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Anderson, held that the claimant’s holiday pay claim was a well-founded unlawful deduction from wages. It ordered Strathmore Hotels Limited to pay the gross sum of £1,456.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not provided the claimant with an up to date written statement of terms and conditions as required by s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. Under s.38 Employment Act 2002, it ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £728.00 for that failure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay was found to be a well-founded unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,456 |
| Other | The respondent failed to provide an up to date written statement of terms and conditions required by s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal made an award under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £728 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,184
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.