Case 2408554/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Jones v Primecare GB Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408554/2022
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Jones brought claims against Primecare GB Limited for unfair dismissal and unauthorised deductions from wages. The case was heard at Liverpool on 23, 24 and 25 April 2024 before Employment Judge Benson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr M Anjum.
The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint failed and was dismissed. The written judgment does not record any separate remedy findings because no claim succeeded.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out further factual detail or legal reasoning beyond the outcome recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment described this as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.