Case 2408560/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Spiklova v Chanmatt Ltd t/a The Waggon Inn — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408560/2020
- Decision date
- 18 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Spiklova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal listed the case as Miss A Spiklova v Chanmatt Ltd t/a The Waggon Inn. By a letter dated 11 February 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment issue and does not identify any monetary award.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 18 March 2021. No lay members are listed, and no legal test is expressly cited in the text beyond the strike-out reason that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to respond to a 11 February 2021 letter giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on the proposed strike out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.