Case 2408560/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Summerskill v Vital Infrastructure Asset Management (VIAM) Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408560/2021
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Summerskill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 28 June 2023 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim is struck out but does not identify the specific heads of claim within the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.