Case 2408564/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ogden v Classic Joinery Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2408564/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ogden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment dated 12 November 2020 and sent to the parties on 26 November 2020, Employment Judge Batten recorded that Mr D Ogden had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. The tribunal awarded him a redundancy payment of £5,250.00.
The tribunal also found that Classic Joinery Ltd had dismissed him in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,433.00. It further found unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday entitlement, ordering gross sums of £7,896.00 and £2,256.00 respectively.
The monetary awards made in the judgment therefore total £19,835.00. No separate apportionment beyond the individual awards is set out in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £5,250.00. | Upheld | — | £5,250 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,433.00. | Upheld | — | £4,433 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £7,896.00. | Upheld | — | £7,896 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,256.00. | Upheld | — | £2,256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,835
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.