Case 2408585/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Henderson v Rains and Son Limited trading as Hunters — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408585/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Henderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Henderson, brought complaints of unauthorised deductions from pay against Rains and Son Limited trading as Hunters. The hearing took place at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 7 June 2023 and 17 November 2023 before Employment Judge McCarthy sitting alone. The judgment records that the complaints concerned the periods 1 August to 31 August 2022, 1 September to 30 September 2022, and commission payments for July 2022 in relation to two identified properties.
The tribunal found that each complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded. All three complaints were dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 1 August 2022 to 31 August 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 1 September 2022 to 30 September 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 concerning commission payments for July 2022 relating to the properties identified by the parties as number 1 property and number 2 property. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.